I don't think you can reasonably complain that the 9fans moderators rejected your argument when they stated that the problem was that they perceived your posting as having been AI-generated.
Many forums are struggling with AI-generated slop. It's inevitable that some human-generated content will be incorrectly flagged.
Perhaps a path forward is to subscribe, lurk for a while, answer a few queries succinctly and accurately, and thus build up a profile as a real user before attempting to initiate such a conversation again?
Or, perhaps a paper at IWP9 next year?
Also, you might consider posting about 9front on the 9front list, rather than 9fans, if your criticisms are specific to its development?
I don't think you can reasonably complain that the 9fans moderators rejected your argument when they stated that the problem was that they perceived your posting as having been AI-generated.
Many forums are struggling with AI-generated slop. It's inevitable that some human-generated content will be incorrectly flagged.
Perhaps a path forward is to subscribe, lurk for a while, answer a few queries succinctly and accurately, and thus build up a profile as a real user before attempting to initiate such a conversation again?
Or, perhaps a paper at IWP9 next year?
Also, you might consider posting about 9front on the 9front list, rather than 9fans, if your criticisms are specific to its development?